TalkAwhile - The Folk Corporation Forum

Artists => Fairport Convention => Topic started by: Banger on January 25, 2008, 09:13:48 PM



Title: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Banger on January 25, 2008, 09:13:48 PM
hello everyone - this my first post.

I first saw fairport in 85/86? in Cardiff. My memory is poor but as far as I recall the Fairport I saw consisted of Simon Nichol, Dave Pegg, Dave Mattocks, and Swarb. Is my memory correct? My wife who also went says they were a five piece with Rick Saunders!

Can anyone help?


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: frogcrutches on January 25, 2008, 09:21:27 PM
Hi Banger, and welcome.
I think I was at the same gig [St. David's Hall?]
I remember Swarb's glass falling off the speaker next to him. He just looked down and laughed, and carried on playing.
I don't remember Ric being there?


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: gower flower (Shirl) on January 25, 2008, 09:21:56 PM
Welcome Banger  :D

Dunno about the line-up, but you might want to check your spelling. ;)

That'd be NICOL and SANDERS and MATTACKS.  ;D

Only teasing. Welcome again.


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Banger on January 25, 2008, 09:28:50 PM
Hi frogcrutches and gower flower.

Your right it was at St Davids Hall. I was a student back then which would explain the problems with my spelling!! I did go to see them a year or so later again at St Davids Hall - I think Rick was with them then.


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: davidmjs on January 26, 2008, 08:28:27 AM
The last tour with the 4 piece lineup was the US tour in 85 I think, so I think there were a few dates prior to that...if my memory serves me correctly DM did come in for Bruce on that....(so DM, Pegg, Nicol, Swarb)...the first tour with the 5 piece lineup (DM, Nicol, Pegg, Ric, Maart) was the Spring 86 tour..  I think that is right anyway...


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Banger on January 26, 2008, 11:10:59 PM
Thanks for clarifying this for me  ;D and my wife  :-[

In hindsight what worries me is that over the last 22 years I have seen the band countless times bought numerous of their albums and have read loads of stuff about them but have failed to register how to spell the names of the band!!. Luckily Richard Thomson wasn't playing in 85 otherwise I would have got his name wrong! ;)


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Jules Gray on January 27, 2008, 03:08:43 PM

I have seen the band countless times bought numerous of their albums and have read loads of stuff about them but have failed to register how to spell the names of the band!!. Luckily Richard Thomson wasn't playing in 85 otherwise I would have got his name wrong! ;)


You mean you'd have forgotten the 'p' in his surname?!

 ;)

Jules


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Nick on January 27, 2008, 07:45:12 PM
No, he was having a joke about the extra, unnecessary 'h' that he'd included  ;)


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Banger on January 27, 2008, 10:36:03 PM
Are any of you guys teachers?

You'll be telling me next that I shouldn't use a preposition to end a sentence with.  And that I shouldn't start a sentence with a conjunction. :D


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Neil on January 27, 2008, 10:56:51 PM

Are any of you guys teachers?

You'll be telling me next that I shouldn't use a preposition to end a sentence with.  And that I shouldn't start a sentence with a conjunction. :D



Some are, the rest just pretend on the internet, welcome to the fun ;D


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: MarkC on January 29, 2008, 01:40:42 AM

Are any of you guys teachers?

You'll be telling me next that I shouldn't use a preposition to end a sentence with.  And that I shouldn't start a sentence with a conjunction. :D



There is no rule in the English language that says you can't end a sentence with a preposition. That "rule" was invented by a minister in the 1800s who felt that since Latin did have such a rule, English should as well. As your own Winston Churchill is rumored to have said, "That is something up with which I will not put."


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Jules Gray on January 29, 2008, 09:29:00 AM

As your own Winston Churchill is rumored to have said, "That is something up with which I will not put."


But surely the rumour had a "u"?

 ;) :D

Jules


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Nick on January 29, 2008, 11:16:20 AM
Alright everyone. How about we give a little bit more honour and respect to Banger for what was after all his first venture onto the board?

In other words, GET BACK ON TOPIC!

Thank you

Nick



Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Barry on January 29, 2008, 11:46:15 AM
Seconded.

And welcome Banger - take this all in the spirit it is intended, which is light hearted banter!


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Banger on January 29, 2008, 01:36:13 PM
Thanks Nick & Barry

Do I take all this in a good spirit - Yes I do

Do I think MarkC should try and get out and  about a little more often - Yes I do

Finally, if I've spelt anything incorrectly or if I've made any grammatical errors in this post - you don't have to correct me because I really don't care. ;)


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: abby (tank girl) on January 29, 2008, 02:14:34 PM
hello banger.  welcome to the madhouse ;D


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: jude on January 29, 2008, 02:17:15 PM
and welcome from me as well and I should have said welcome ages ago as I am the newbie welcomer....oh the guilt, the guilt..... :-[ :D


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: gower flower (Shirl) on January 29, 2008, 02:31:07 PM

and welcome from me as well and I should have said welcome ages ago as I am the newbie welcomer....oh the guilt, the guilt..... :-[ :D


You just can't get the staff nowadays... :P ;)


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: abby (tank girl) on January 29, 2008, 02:41:48 PM
GF, i think jude may be moonlighting ::)


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: PaulT on January 29, 2008, 03:25:44 PM
with Leo Sayer!?

Hi Banger - good to have you on (the) board!


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: GubGub (Al) on January 29, 2008, 03:59:06 PM
Or Bruce Willis?


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Nick on January 29, 2008, 04:04:41 PM
Now it's gone the other way  ::)

I said, ON TOPIC!!!


sheesh!  ::)  ;D


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: jude on January 29, 2008, 04:08:30 PM

Now it's gone the other way  ::)

I said, ON TOPIC!!!


sheesh!  ::)  ;D


nothing to do with me... ::)


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: MarkC on January 29, 2008, 04:38:06 PM


As your own Winston Churchill is rumored to have said, "That is something up with which I will not put."


But surely the rumour had a "u"?

 ;) :D

Jules


A little transatlantic spelling dispute! Sorry for the thread hijack, gang!  ;)


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Neil on January 30, 2008, 12:22:18 AM

Now it's gone the other way  ::)

I said, ON TOPIC!!!


sheesh!  ::)  ;D


Sometimes there is no stopping them n ;D if it carries on I shall be the topic Nazi and lock it.


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: frogcrutches on January 30, 2008, 12:30:35 AM


Now it's gone the other way  ::)

I said, ON TOPIC!!!


sheesh!  ::)  ;D


Sometimes there is no stopping them n ;D if it carries on I shall be the topic Nazi and lock it.


Start with the Polish thread, and see how it goes. ::)


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: johanna/ulla on January 30, 2008, 11:52:18 AM



Now it's gone the other way  ::)

I said, ON TOPIC!!!


sheesh!  ::)  ;D


Sometimes there is no stopping them n ;D if it carries on I shall be the topic Nazi and lock it.


Start with the Polish thread, and see how it goes. ::)



Don't mention the war!!!


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Sir Martin on January 30, 2008, 04:02:58 PM

Thanks Nick & Barry

Do I take all this in a good spirit - Yes I do

Do I think MarkC should try and get out and  about a little more often - Yes I do

Finally, if I've spelt anything incorrectly or if I've made any grammatical errors in this post - you don't have to correct me because I really don't care. ;)


Well said - If god had meant us to spell, he would not have given us spell checkers.


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: Banger on January 30, 2008, 09:58:26 PM
.....and there endeth this post

Credits.

Thanks to DavidMJS for answering my query.
Thanks to everyone else for pushing the post replies up to 28 on what was after all my first foray on this site.

Sneak preview - I am currently working on my next highly provocative post which has the working title of ...........wait for it....fairport 1987/8.


Title: Re: fairport 1985/6
Post by: GubGub (Al) on January 30, 2008, 11:17:40 PM



Well said - If god had meant us to spell, he would not have given us spell checkers.


Is Bill Gates God then?