TalkAwhile - The Folk Corporation Forum
November 23, 2024, 02:56:16 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: RT concert  (Read 11972 times)
RichardH
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 97
Loc: London N19


« on: July 04, 2007, 09:39:57 PM »

Go to the RT Beesweb site and the wonders of broadband will deliver you with a couple of clicks to over two hours worth of a recent Washington DC concert broadcast.

It's pretty breathtaking and I've just been skimming it. One of the highlights is Al Bowlly, another one is Pete Zorn proving once and for all that Bad Monkey and Tear Stained Letter are sisters under the skin.

Be interested in other views.

R
Logged
Bob Barrows
Give me time ... it will wear on me
Folkcorp Guru 3rd Dan
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2159
Loc: Auburn, MA USA


Bob


WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2007, 09:42:06 PM »

This was mentioned in another thread and I downloaded it.
It was kind of lenghty so I edited it and split it into tracks, raising the volume on RT's between-song patter in the process. If anyone is interested in it in this format, let me know and I will upload it to savefile
Logged
Ollie
Always one there is.
Folkcorp Guru 3rd Dan
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 3539
Loc: Sheffield

I Morris, therefore I am


WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2007, 09:44:50 PM »


This was mentioned in another thread and I downloaded it.
It was kind of lenghty so I edited it and split it into tracks, raising the volume on RT's between-song patter in the process. If anyone is interested in it in this format, let me know and I will upload it to savefile


Yes please  Smiley (I would IM you but I can't)
Logged

"Tradition must be respected, convention can be broken; but only when you know which is which."
Bob Barrows
Give me time ... it will wear on me
Folkcorp Guru 3rd Dan
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2159
Loc: Auburn, MA USA


Bob


WWW
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2007, 10:02:20 PM »

Ollie, I'm not clear - can you receive IMs? Or is the restriction on both sending and receiving?
Logged
Ollie
Always one there is.
Folkcorp Guru 3rd Dan
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 3539
Loc: Sheffield

I Morris, therefore I am


WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2007, 10:19:31 PM »


Ollie, I'm not clear - can you receive IMs? Or is the restriction on both sending and receiving?


I can recive but not send, so if you sent me one, I couldn't reply. It's just a lot easier to e-mail me.  Smiley
Logged

"Tradition must be respected, convention can be broken; but only when you know which is which."
ollythedolly
Grownup
Folkcorp Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 698
Loc: Oxfordshire

One more time with feeling


« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2007, 10:26:10 PM »

i would love a copy! could you sent to my e-mail? or have you got a URL for it?
Thanks, Olly.

(ollie - i couldn't use the IM until i was 17....so how have you blagged half of it? Tongue )
Logged
Bob Barrows
Give me time ... it will wear on me
Folkcorp Guru 3rd Dan
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2159
Loc: Auburn, MA USA


Bob


WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2007, 10:33:31 PM »

It will be a URL.
I'm not sure if I should post it here. Mods? Any restictions about this?
Logged
Ollie
Always one there is.
Folkcorp Guru 3rd Dan
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 3539
Loc: Sheffield

I Morris, therefore I am


WWW
« Reply #7 on: July 04, 2007, 10:36:42 PM »


i would love a copy! could you sent to my e-mail? or have you got a URL for it?
Thanks, Olly.

(ollie - i couldn't use the IM until i was 17....so how have you blagged half of it? Tongue )


I get them sent to my e-mail. I know this is completely off-topic, and there are other places this could go, but could I just say one thing. Isn't it more dangerous from a child pretection point of view, for under 18's to give out their e-mail addresses, than to be conatcted through IM, which, I'm sure, could be moderated if need be...

Sorry, back OT, still not sure whether to go and see RTB at Cambridge in October...
Logged

"Tradition must be respected, convention can be broken; but only when you know which is which."
ollythedolly
Grownup
Folkcorp Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 698
Loc: Oxfordshire

One more time with feeling


« Reply #8 on: July 04, 2007, 10:37:54 PM »

cheeky devil Wink - i did that, but i started getting 2 a day and I couldn't reply to them....got annoying in the end.
Logged
Bob Barrows
Give me time ... it will wear on me
Folkcorp Guru 3rd Dan
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2159
Loc: Auburn, MA USA


Bob


WWW
« Reply #9 on: July 04, 2007, 10:53:35 PM »

I've had my answer, so PM me if you want the link.
Logged
Bob Barrows
Give me time ... it will wear on me
Folkcorp Guru 3rd Dan
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2159
Loc: Auburn, MA USA


Bob


WWW
« Reply #10 on: July 04, 2007, 11:00:10 PM »


Sorry, back OT, still not sure whether to go and see RTB at Cambridge in October...
If you have the opportunity, take it!  Smiley
Logged
Ollie
Always one there is.
Folkcorp Guru 3rd Dan
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 3539
Loc: Sheffield

I Morris, therefore I am


WWW
« Reply #11 on: July 04, 2007, 11:02:55 PM »



Sorry, back OT, still not sure whether to go and see RTB at Cambridge in October...
If you have the opportunity, take it!  Smiley


Yeah, it's just I'm seeing him at Cropredy, so I don't know whether my parents will want to fork out another £60 for the three of us to go, when we have just seen him...
Logged

"Tradition must be respected, convention can be broken; but only when you know which is which."
Nick
Calendar Boy
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3167
Loc: South Oxon


Block and Chip


« Reply #12 on: July 04, 2007, 11:17:15 PM »


 I know this is completely off-topic, and there are other places this could go, but could I just say one thing. Isn't it more dangerous from a child pretection point of view, for under 18's to give out their e-mail addresses, than to be conatcted through IM, which, I'm sure, could be moderated if need be...


The reason is liability. Any issues with your email go to your ISP. Issues with the board's IM system go to Colin. It is for Colin's legal safety that IMs are not offered to under 18s. Sorry!

The safest approach would be to not allow under 18s onto the board at all. But that would be too draconian we think  Undecided

Oh, and IMs can't be moderated (fortunately or unfortunately depending on your point of view). The board software is constructed in such a way that only the sender and recipient can read an IM.

Cheers

Nick
Logged

You've got questions, we've got assumptions
Ollie
Always one there is.
Folkcorp Guru 3rd Dan
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 3539
Loc: Sheffield

I Morris, therefore I am


WWW
« Reply #13 on: July 04, 2007, 11:18:19 PM »



 I know this is completely off-topic, and there are other places this could go, but could I just say one thing. Isn't it more dangerous from a child pretection point of view, for under 18's to give out their e-mail addresses, than to be conatcted through IM, which, I'm sure, could be moderated if need be...


The reason is liability. Any issues with your email go to your ISP. Issues with the board's IM system go to Colin. It is for Colin's legal safety that IMs are not offered to under 18s. Sorry!

The safest approach would be to not allow under 18s onto the board at all. But that would be too draconian we think  Undecided

Oh, and IMs can't be moderated (fortunately or unfortunately depending on your point of view). The board software is constructed in such a way that only the sender and recipient can read an IM.

Cheers

Nick


I understand.

Ollie
Logged

"Tradition must be respected, convention can be broken; but only when you know which is which."
Anna
I'll be Susan
Folkcorp Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 982
Loc: London Colney, near St Albans, Herts


That's her, with the fluteystick...


WWW
« Reply #14 on: July 05, 2007, 12:23:55 AM »

Sorry if this is out of place, and I know it's completely off-topic - but isn't it an awful reflection of our society that the kids (sorry Ollie and Olly) have to be the ones that understand?

I've just been at a folk night (morris dancing in the street - and the pubs - and sessions etc) down in the old town part of St Albans (St Michael's if anyone knows the area) and it was lovely to instantaneously see the kids running around with no visible parental support again.  If only...

Further discussion in the Arms (sorry Ollie and Ollly) if needs be.  Arse!
Logged

Flute player seeks ragtime band...
Nick the Stick
distracted by some wiggly string
Folkcorp Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 734
Loc: Eastbourne


Alright here?


« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2007, 09:20:35 AM »

Funny you saying that about Tear Stained Letter and Bad Monkey. My band have been doing TSL for 21 years (give the sax player a chance to go mental) and when I first heard BM I thought finally fopund a replecement.
Logged

terryg
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


« Reply #16 on: July 10, 2007, 01:03:40 AM »

Bad Monkee is definately TSL II. It's just not as good a song. That's one of the problems I had with Sweet Warrior overall, a lot of the songs are just not up to snuff. Take Care The Road You Choose sounds to me like Jennie from Daring Adventures, just not as good.

TG
Logged
RichardH
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 97
Loc: London N19


« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2007, 09:11:14 AM »

Angels to rest = She cut off her long silken hair

Mr Stupid = Elvis Costello pastiche

I ain't complaining.

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.156 seconds with 20 queries.